• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Kane Russell Colman Logan PC

  • Attorneys
  • Practices
    • Bankruptcy, Insolvency & Creditors’ Rights
      • Distressed Assets
    • Business & Corporate
      • Corporate Finance
      • Cyber Security
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • SEC Reporting
    • Employment
      • Immigration
      • OSHA Defense
    • Financial Services
    • Health Care & Medical Peer Review
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation
      • Complex Commercial Litigation
      • Insurance
      • Investment Fraud
      • Large Loss Subrogation
      • Nonsubscriber Defense
      • OSHA Defense
      • Personal Injury
      • Products Liability
      • Professional Liability
    • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Financing
    • Tax
  • Industries
    • China
    • Construction
    • Energy, Oil and Gas
    • Environmental
    • Esports
    • Manufacturing
    • Railroad
    • Retail, Restaurant & Hospitality
    • Transportation
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • Events
    • News
    • Webinars
    • Subscribe
  • About
    • 25 Years in the Making
    • Alliances
    • Careers
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Administrators
  • Contact
  • Nav Social Menu

    • Email
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter

Insurance Fraud Investigators Entitled to Overtime Pay Under FLSA

Home  //  Insights   //   Articles  //  Employment  //  Insurance Fraud Investigators Entitled to Overtime Pay Under FLSA

May 24, 2019 Colin Durham Employment

Published on the SHRM website, 2/3/16

Insurance fraud investigators are not exempt from the overtime pay requirements mandated by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), according to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

As part of its insurance business, GEICO General Insurance Company hires security investigators to work in its claims department for the purpose of investigating claims that are suspected of being fraudulent. The FLSA requires employers to pay overtime for each hour their employees work in excess of 40 hours per week. However, individuals who are employed in a bona fide executive, administrative or professional capacity are exempt from the FLSA’s overtime pay requirements. The exemption requires, among other things, that the employee’s duties are performed in an office or in a nonmanual work setting, are directly related to the management of the company, and include the exercise of discretion and independent judgment.

GEICO classified its investigators as exempt from the FLSA’s overtime pay protections, citing the exercise of discretion by the investigators on an issue of significance to the company—the decision on whether to prosecute claims the investigators suspect of being fraudulent. As part of that decision, GEICO further points to the fact that the investigators are required to interview witnesses, collect evidence and evaluate the strength of the claim during the investigative process.

In 2010, Samuel Calderon brought a collective action under the FLSA on behalf of himself and other company investigators, claiming that they were improperly classified. The trial court granted summary judgment to the investigators on their overtime pay claim, finding that their primary duties did not sufficiently involve the exercise of discretion and independent judgment on matters of significance to GEICO.

The 4th Circuit affirmed the trial court’s decision, finding that conducting factual investigations and making recommendations to GEICO on whether to prosecute certain insurance claims as fraudulent is not, by itself, sufficient to satisfy the exemption’s requirements. Of significance, the 4th Circuit determined that the investigators had no role in managing, running or servicing the company’s general business operations nor developing, reviewing, evaluating or recommending to GEICO business policies or strategies related to the claims they investigated. Without such a role, the investigators could not be classified as serving in a bona fide executive, administrative or professional capacity. Accordingly, the investigators were entitled to overtime pay.

Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance Co., 4th Cir., No. 14-2111 (Dec. 23, 2015).

Professional Pointer: This case provides a clear reminder that employers periodically need to examine employment positions they are treating as exempt from the FLSA’s overtime pay requirements. Given that it is the policy of the courts to construe all such exemptions narrowly, the best practice is for employers to err on the side of paying overtime.

Read original article on shrm.org

Kane Russell Coleman Logan is a full-service law firm with offices in Dallas and Houston. Formed in 1992, the Firm provides professional services for clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies to medium-sized public and private companies to entrepreneurs. KRCL handles transactional, litigation and bankruptcy matters in Texas and throughout the country.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Insights

  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Press Releases
  • Webinars
  • Subscribe

Topics

Blog Network

Framing Issues
Trains , Trucks & The Law
Energy Law Today
Law of Banking
Law in the Workplace
Retail Restaurant & Hospitality Law
Insolvency Insights

Footer

Who We Are

  • About
  • Attorneys
  • Administrators
  • Careers

What We Do

  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Insights
  • News

Dallas Office

Bank of America Plaza
901 Main Street
Suite 5200
Dallas, Texas 75202

Phone: 214-777-4200
Fax: 214-777-4299

Houston Office

Galleria Tower II
5051 Westheimer Road
10th Floor
Houston, Texas 77056

Phone: 713-425-7400
Fax: 713-425-7700

Pay Your Invoice

Pay Your Retainer

Kane Russell Colman Logan PC© 2021 All Rights Reserved Log in
  • Attorneys
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Insights
  • About
  • Contact
Made by Content Pilot
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.AcceptRead more