Invariably, when an insured tenders a third-party claim, the first two questions asked by the insurance company are: (1) does it have a duty to defend this claim under the terms of the applicable policy; and (2) does it have a duty to indemnify its insured against any losses stemming out of the claim? Until a recent Texas Supreme Court case, it was unclear under Texas law whether answering “no” to Question No. 1 implicitly required the same answer to Question No. 2. However, on December 11, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in D.R. Horton-Texas, Ltd. v. Markel International Insurance Company, Ltd., wherein it resolved this question when holding that the duty to indemnify is not dependent on the duty to defend, and that an insurer may have a duty to indemnify on a given set of facts, even if the duty to defend never arises.
Insights // // LITIGATION ALERT: TEXAS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE — Is the Duty to Indemnify dependent on the Duty to Defend?//
Kane Russell Coleman Logan is a full-service law firm with offices in Dallas and Houston. Formed in 1992 with 5 lawyers, today KRCL employs more than 70 attorneys. The Firm provides professional services for clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies to medium-sized public and private companies to entrepreneurs. KRCL handles transactional, litigation and bankruptcy matters in Texas and throughout the country.